[CentOS-devel] Atomic-developer-bundle for inclusion in Atomic SIG

On 10/01/2015 05:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 24/09/15 18:17, Jason Brooks wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb at redhat.com>
>>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 5:25:51 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Atomic-developer-bundle for inclusion in Atomic SIG
>>>
>>> On 09/23/2015 08:17 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>>>> On 09/08/2015 07:08 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> As part of Project Atomic [1],  we are working on a toolchain (as of
>>>>> now it is a Vagrant box) i.e. atomic-developer-bundle [2], for helping
>>>>> application developers package their microservice architecture
>>>>> applications for delivery via Linux containers.
>>>>>
>>>>> ADB (atomic developer bundle) is supported on GNU/Linux distributions,
>>>>> OS X and Windows. It has (or is going to have) all the goodies that
>>>>> are part of Project Atomic to better enable Linux containers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, the Vagrant box is based on CentOS. Therefore I think it
>>>>> makes more sense to include it in the CentOS Atomic SIG or any other
>>>>> appropriate SIG.  I believe this will open channels with the community
>>>>> and lead to greater participation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know your thoughts on including the ADB as part of a SIG. For
>>>>> details please go through the README in ADB github repo [2]
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/projectatomic
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am still looking for suggestion /comments for this.
>> I'm +1 as well
> I'm largely +/- 0 on this, with the slight hesitation that this Atomic
> is about an atomicapp, and has no real relation to an ostree driven
> atomic host, which is what we've worked on in the Atomic SIG so far.
>
> the SIG proposal also mostly talks about the platform side of things,
> which AtomicApp isnt a part of.
>
> could the atomicapp effort better fit in elsewhere ?
>
>
I cant think of any other place for Atomic App other than Atomic SIG at 
this point (unless we are going to have a container SIG). Also I think 
Atomic APP does not fit in Virt SIG  as it just consumes virt SIG .

Initially Project Atomic was about only atomic host (similar to Atomic 
SIG) but now it is a umbrella project for many more things. So I think 
it is better to include the ADB stuff + Atomic APP in Atomic SIG as 
these are part of Project Atomic umbrella.

Thanks,
Lala