On 10/01/2015 05:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 24/09/15 18:17, Jason Brooks wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb at redhat.com> >>> To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 5:25:51 AM >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Atomic-developer-bundle for inclusion in Atomic SIG >>> >>> On 09/23/2015 08:17 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >>>> On 09/08/2015 07:08 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> As part of Project Atomic [1], we are working on a toolchain (as of >>>>> now it is a Vagrant box) i.e. atomic-developer-bundle [2], for helping >>>>> application developers package their microservice architecture >>>>> applications for delivery via Linux containers. >>>>> >>>>> ADB (atomic developer bundle) is supported on GNU/Linux distributions, >>>>> OS X and Windows. It has (or is going to have) all the goodies that >>>>> are part of Project Atomic to better enable Linux containers. >>>>> >>>>> Currently, the Vagrant box is based on CentOS. Therefore I think it >>>>> makes more sense to include it in the CentOS Atomic SIG or any other >>>>> appropriate SIG. I believe this will open channels with the community >>>>> and lead to greater participation. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know your thoughts on including the ADB as part of a SIG. For >>>>> details please go through the README in ADB github repo [2] >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/projectatomic >>>>> [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am still looking for suggestion /comments for this. >> I'm +1 as well > I'm largely +/- 0 on this, with the slight hesitation that this Atomic > is about an atomicapp, and has no real relation to an ostree driven > atomic host, which is what we've worked on in the Atomic SIG so far. > > the SIG proposal also mostly talks about the platform side of things, > which AtomicApp isnt a part of. > > could the atomicapp effort better fit in elsewhere ? > > I cant think of any other place for Atomic App other than Atomic SIG at this point (unless we are going to have a container SIG). Also I think Atomic APP does not fit in Virt SIG as it just consumes virt SIG . Initially Project Atomic was about only atomic host (similar to Atomic SIG) but now it is a umbrella project for many more things. So I think it is better to include the ADB stuff + Atomic APP in Atomic SIG as these are part of Project Atomic umbrella. Thanks, Lala