On 09/23/2015 08:17 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: > On 09/08/2015 07:08 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As part of Project Atomic [1], we are working on a toolchain (as of >> now it is a Vagrant box) i.e. atomic-developer-bundle [2], for helping >> application developers package their microservice architecture >> applications for delivery via Linux containers. >> >> ADB (atomic developer bundle) is supported on GNU/Linux distributions, >> OS X and Windows. It has (or is going to have) all the goodies that >> are part of Project Atomic to better enable Linux containers. >> >> Currently, the Vagrant box is based on CentOS. Therefore I think it >> makes more sense to include it in the CentOS Atomic SIG or any other >> appropriate SIG. I believe this will open channels with the community >> and lead to greater participation. >> >> Let me know your thoughts on including the ADB as part of a SIG. For >> details please go through the README in ADB github repo [2] >> >> [1] https://github.com/projectatomic >> [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle > > Hi, > > I am still looking for suggestion /comments for this. I'm +1 - have you brought this up at a meeting for discussion? I can't think of any objections but ... might be good to run through once in real time with other folks if we haven't already. (I don't recall it, but I have missed a few meetings.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150923/3ffdbe8e/attachment-0008.sig>