Awesome. We're looking forward to giving this a spin on Barreleye. -----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Fabian Arrotin Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:07 PM To: centos-devel at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS-7 / powerpc LE bring up -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/09/15 17:49, James O'Connor wrote: > >> On Sep 23, 2015, at 11:53 AM, James O'Connor >> <jpoc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:27 PM, James O'Connor >>> <jpoc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> As of last night, the minimal c7.01.01-ppc64le buildroot is complete >>> and I'm untangling circular dependencies in the CentOS >>> 7.1.1503 source rpms. I've built 700 of 2523 source packages so 27% >>> complete with this first pass. >>> >>> Next, I'll bootstrap java-1.7.0-openjdk and continue to loop through >>> ppc64le rpm builds with mock. In the next 1-2 weeks, I should have >>> 95+% of the source packages building for ppc64le. >>> At which point we can create the first CentOS 7 ppc64le VMs and >>> rebuild c7.01.02-ppc64le atop CentOS 7 instead of Fedora 21. >>> >> >> The latest CentOS 7 ppc64le tally is 1983 of 2523 source packages >> building or 78% complete. Hit a small snag with the atlas package not >> building that I didn't run into before. Thinking it may be due to the >> single core on the Fedora 21 builder VM. Once atlas builds, the rest >> the source packages should fall into line in short order. >> java-1.7.0-openjdk is built as are most of the apache/jpackage/maven >> stack. >> > > The atlas pthread build issue was resolved by adding multiple cores to > the Fedora 21 builder VM. The Centos 7 ppc64le phase1 build is > 97+% complete. I have built 2460 source packages, over 6400 binary > rpms and there shouldn't be any more circular dependencies to unwind. > We are ready to create the first pass CentOS 7 LE builder VMs. There > are at least 57 source packages in the 2523 source package list that > are exclusive to Intel arches. > > If someone on the centos build team would find me on irc or email, we > could discuss lorax version and configuration to build CentOS 7 > ppc64le builders and tying my c7.01.01-ppc64le repository into a more > structured build process to generate a c7.01.02-ppc64le repository. > > In the meantime, I'll circle back and help get CentOS 7 ppc64/ppc > caught up to the same point as ppc64le. > > Thanks -James As an image talks more than words : https://twitter.com/Arrfab/status/647471456650199044 Thanks James for the hard work on ppc64le .. now also time to do the same for ppc64 :D Happy Friday ! - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYFjUcACgkQnVkHo1a+xU7NFwCgm6Fbyk03MszUaiAZjpFoeh77 LgIAoJlDnv8U9HiP4V8vVTvd3hfA3f1L =Ee1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel at centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel