On 04/29/2016 05:00 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 29/04/16 00:28, Matthias Runge wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I wonder, if there is more interest here for starting a logging and >> monitoring SIG. It should provide (as the name says) for logging and >> monitoring. With people running huge installations, it makes sense to >> have more centralized logging, but there's currently not that much in >> CentOS repositories. >> >> I could imagine to have both tools and also installation and >> configuration bits and pieces to be maintained by the SIG. >> >> Before I'd be putting out more details, about what I could imagine or >> what I would like to see, I would like to see some more interested folks >> raising their hands. >> >> Best, >> Matthias > Seems interesting ! > Wondering if you're already targeting some known solutions for the > logging part at least. > For example the ELK stack is pretty known and (ab)used those days, but > proper packaging in .rpm format is still missing (and nothing even at > the Fedora level) so is that something you had in mind ? We are targeting the EFK stack initially - we already have a lot of fluentd users, and most of the rpm packaging work for fluentd and its ruby dependencies has already been done. > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160429/82fdc36c/attachment-0008.html>