[CentOS-devel] Plans for SSO across centos.org subdomains?

On 16/08/2016 11:33, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
>> prolly worth looking at keycloak once
>
> Is there any reason why you're only mentioning Keycloak here?
> Are there any features Ipsilon is missing that would rule it out for
> you, or is there
> some other reason?

Speaking with my Ipsilon developer hat on, I (and I imagine Patrick too) 
would be interested what features people feel are missing from Ipsilon. 
We've got plenty of new features coming up, but it's always good to know 
what else people would like to see :)

-- 
HJ