On 18/08/16 18:03, Rich Bowen wrote: > So, I guess I'm asking if people still think it's valuable, and will try > to carve out a little time for this each week. Or as was suggested in > the meeting, should we attempt to merge the two meetings in some > meaningful way, until such time as other Cloud Software communities see > a benefit in participating? As we saw last week with the tripleO issues, its quite important we not only retain this meeting, but also bring all interfaces from the RDO side into the CentOS project to this meeting. At the very least, the Cloud SIG's usage of resources ( and interfaces to/from cbs.centos.org / ci.centos.org / buildlogs.centos.org and the mirror network ) should be talked through at the meeting. At this point its all done via arbitrary pings on irc, emails etc - and while this is ok for emergency work, the regular stuff should be brought to the SIG meeting. Secondly, not having this meeting means there is no way for the other SIG's to interface with the group - its taking a long time, as an example, to sort out what is needed and what the process might be for the Power8le builds for RDO to kick off; similarly as folks request deps on other SIG content ( ceph as an example ) - we still need a place focus those conversations and I think it makes far more sense to do that in the Cloud SIG meeting rather than a RDO meeting, since it works both ways. So, I think the question that there is no other cloud community working with the Cloud SIG, is actually a wrong question. The question should be, is RDO doing anything that anyone else in the ecosystem needs to care about - and is anyone else in the ecosystem doing anything that RDO should care about ? Then work that back through to also include, does RDO do anything that the CentOS Project interfaces with. regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc