[CentOS-devel] [altarch?] Naming scheme and lorax parameters for userland + non-distro kernel builds

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/02/16 14:24, Brian Stinson wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm working on putting some things together for a couple of the
> Intel boards (Edison, Jaguarboard, etc.) and was wondering if
> there's a standard way we should be naming things on the install
> media.
> 
> For the rpi2, we use 'CentOS Altarch 7 (1511) Userland for armhfp'
> 
> A lot of the Intel boards out there require a newer or otherwise 
> non-distro kernel so I was considering titling the install media
> like this:
> 
> CentOS Altarch 7 (1511) Userland for x86_64
> 
> Not sure if the 'Altarch' bit applies because it's the standard
> x86_64 userland (no rebuilding needed).
> 
> Cheers! --Brian

Well, indeed pros and cons ... I'd use "Userland" to show indeed that
kernel isn't the one from CentOs 7 x86_64 (like we did for armhfp) but
I'd remove the AltArch tag. otoh, if that image would be produced
under the AltArch SIG umbrella, it's worth keeping it in the name.

- -- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlayAWYACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5csgCeND1FxgDEeFgEJ3b/G2pGWQmZ
5tAAn2PaS9oJkZUkpoqKceJ4If0DZkcR
=bACy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----