[CentOS-devel] Questions regarding SCLo rpms
BC
centoslistmail at gmail.comThu Jan 28 03:59:39 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Minutes from CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2016-01-27)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Questions regarding SCLo rpms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What is the meaning of the prepended "rh-" in some of the scl RPM names? At first I thought they were rebuilt from official upstream RHEL rpms, but it appears non "rh-" prepended ones are, too. Which leads me to wondering who is the original upstream for packages in the sclo/x86_64/{sclo,rh} directories? Is the rh directory that which contains RPMs blessed by RH (as in, they provide support for) but which exists to centos users as a rebuild of the official RHEL RPMs as all the base packages generally are? I know that as a centos user, the upstream for the purpose of support and bug submission is never RHEL, so my question re: upstream is more of a point of origin question, I guess. Thank you for your time -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160127/efb9207e/attachment-0003.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Minutes from CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting on #centos-devel (2016-01-27)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Questions regarding SCLo rpms
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list