On 12/01/16 03:51, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> should centos-release-scl not have at least a "Obsoletes: centos-release-SCL" statement? >> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-SCL-6-5.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm >> vs >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-scl-6-6.el6.centos.noarch.rpm > > And a "Provides: centos-release-SCL", for people like me with "mock" > configurations that used it. honza can shed a bit more light on this, but it was discussed before the first SCL release - and it appeared to not be needed, as new users would just migrate over. regards, -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc