[CentOS-devel] Question about authoritative SIG for specific pkg[s] (wrt ConfigMgmt SIG)
Fabian Arrotin
arrfab at centos.orgTue Jul 12 07:10:52 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] ConfigMgmt SIG Status
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Question about authoritative SIG for specific pkg[s] (wrt ConfigMgmt SIG)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I just had a look at CBS and was wondering how one SIG (so not ConfigMgmt SIG specific, but let's use that as an example) can interact with other SIGs. One example is Ansible : it seems some other SIGs are relying on it and so actually the ConfigMgmgt SIG isn't able to build it as it's already built with the same ENVR but in a different target/tag : https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1947 What would be the option for this ? Actually the direct option is for the ConfigMgmt SIG to just tag that build (for example for ansible-2.1.0.0-1.el7) so that it will appear in the correct repositories, but I'm wondering if such SIG wouldn't have to be considered "authoritative" and so having to discuss/bump/build new releases, and then other SIGs can just consume/tag a specific build/ENVR they want in their own repositories. -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160712/e0d72780/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] ConfigMgmt SIG Status
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Question about authoritative SIG for specific pkg[s] (wrt ConfigMgmt SIG)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list