[CentOS-devel] Rebuilding RDO for ppc64le

Mon Jul 11 07:22:35 UTC 2016
Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>

On 11/07/16 09:15, Xiandong Meng wrote:
> In RDO Austin BOF meeting, I have proposed to rebuild RDO packages for
> ppc64le. And a few discussions have been carried over since then. Now
> with the power builders up and running
> on cbs (http://cbs.centos.org/koji/hosts), I'd like to write to the
> mailinglist for more broad discussing.
> 
> The goal is to rebuild RDO packages for ppc64le in CBS. And we will
> start with Mitaka release as it is a recent stable release. And one of
> the idea was to 
> 
> 1. create a new tag (cloud7-openstack-mitaka-candidate-ppc64le?)

It depends on the Cloud SIG and specifically RDO people here : either
they want to take responsability of altarch builds for mitaka, and so
that means that if it fails for that specific arch, it will fail the
whole task (and so also x86_64), or as you mention, using a different
tag, so that task are separate (and so one needs to submit against that
tag too).
That seems the more common option for now, especially when starting to
build for a new arch.

> 2. import all 'noarch' builds from cloud7-openstack-mitaka-* tags
> 3. send all required packages to the builder

Ideally those would be the same SRPMs as for x86_64. If specific patches
would need to be added, those would need to be included in upstream
SRPMs too.

> 4. test resulting packages for installation & function validation (via
> ci pipeline?)

That would be difficult, as there is no ppc64/ppc64le hardware in CI at
the moment

> 5. import/merge all of them to propose cloud7-openstack-* tag
> 
> I think we need to proceed with this work without touching x86 tags
> until it is ready for merge.  I have experience building the packages
> with local mock build environment,
> but i may need help to initiate that build work in CBS. Any
> comments/suggestions are welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Alex Meng<mailto:mengxiandong at gmail.com>
> mengxiandong at gmail.com <mailto:mengxiandong at gmail.com>
> 


-- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160711/e81510aa/attachment-0008.sig>