-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/2016 09:11 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 06/02/2016 03:57 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> gmp-4.3.1-10.el6 provides these libraries: >> >> libgmp.so.3 -> libgmp.so.3.5.0 libgmp.so.3.5.0 libgmpxx.so.4 -> >> libgmpxx.so.4.1.0 libgmpxx.so.4.1.0 libmp.so.3 -> >> libmp.so.3.1.14 libmp.so.3.1.14 >> >> 'libmp.so' from 'gmp' conflicts with same library provided by >> 'mp' package that I wish to include on Epel6 repositories. >> >> Is it reasonable for you splitting off libmp.so from 'gmp' in a >> sub-package ? > > I'd add to what wolfy stated by pointing out that we're not the > only 'EL' out there. If we made this change, it would still be > incompatible with EPEL, because EPEL builds against RHEL, not > CentOS. This would introduce incompatibilities between Scientific > Linux, RHEL, CentOS and any of the other variant builds out there. > > Wolfy is correct. Your best course of action is to submit this as a > bug via redhat's bugzilla. > Thanks for your replies. I'm going to package 'mp' libraries in a private directory (/usr/lib/mp) for EPEL6. - -- - --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXUWIxAAoJELbsjn1s5tCKnvsIAJwhxvoJIApVDaeop2pqjv/V g0qa5Mh82WGQFBpKVCtp/cqxUu8b9t3rHinNiNKRg5l8DVH2Rn/PfRTnn+PeCcGu RQjPAYKvZMcgB1zmq5o6urCuOKOUh8CbJ/j2fg51nIkYdY2eP/6PjQBiwJV+ltxj NAbeMnLRIT83CsiySUV8sl5BfduiRZnAJFhNMRaT7LxPilByonCjOdE4Kwx48eA+ PXaqDmbd2BvwfnEQEIgsywfzoAmMJ92vwFr/ozpecS/pOtPu465Q3BG7txTxuOvG FacDfkIaay1Lg/UOVB5vVchpRW+UqLUS4eNF+BZmNPkmfpHs/UJgtulHMoVQUGM= =k9u5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----