[CentOS-devel] [opstools] next steps

Wed Jun 29 13:37:28 UTC 2016
Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>

On 06/29/2016 07:20 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> fluentd-0.12.20 requires
>
> rubygem-cool.io
> rubygem-http_parser.rb
> rubygem-msgpack
> rubygem-sigdump
> rubygem-string-scrub
> rubygem-thread_safe
> rubygem-tzinfo
> rubygem-tzinfo-data
> rubygem-yajl-ruby
> systemd
>
> As for their dependants, I'll let ya'll figure it out.

I'm assuming we already have all of these packages in the cloud sig 
opstools tag/target?

>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 06/29/2016 06:15 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> it looks like the OpsTools SIG was approved[1]. *yay*!
>>
>> So, the next steps should be to create a build target, tags.
>> I would like to rebuild or to retag builds already built
>> under a tag of the cloud SIG.
>>
>> What would be the preferred way here? Rebuild? Just tag?
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/OpsTools
>>
>> We probably need to rebuild.  That means starting with the lowest level
>> dependencies and working our way up.
>>
>> Is there some way to track down a top level package and all of its
>> dependencies?  For example, if we want to copy fluentd into the opstools
>> channel/target/buildroot/whatever, is there some way to identify all of its
>> dependencies, and all of the dependencies' dependencies, etc.?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel