Feel free to file a BZ upstream, as otherwise I seriously doubt that CentOS is going to diverge from RHEL on this. On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Alan Pevec <apevec at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-02-26 17:16 GMT+01:00 Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > >> There were some install issues with some Intel Skylake > >> chipsets/processors for CentOS-7. > >> > >> We have created a newer installer to fix this issue and the ISOs > >> (CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1602-99.iso or CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1602-99.iso) > > > > What was the fix, is there rhbz# ? On i7 6700 machine I was still > > getting freezes until I've removed rhgb and loadvideo from grub > > config. > > > > Cheers, > > Alan > > Would it seem reasonable to anyone else to simply rip the "rhgb" > option the heck out of the anaconda based grub configuration tool, at > least by default? The extra software stack and features required to > support a pretty "oooh, it's booting!!!" graphical boot process has > repeatedly proven fragile and actually blocks the critical task that > is supposed to run from grub, namely booting the system. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160306/f28f6dff/attachment-0008.html>