On 24/03/16 09:53, Howard Johnson wrote: > > On 24/03/2016 08:42, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> unfortunately, there isnt much else that offers us the capabilities we >> need. I've been looking these last few weeks for alternatives and they >> all come up short. > > Is there a list of these requirements somewhere? > > A thought at the back of my mind whenever git.centos.org is mentioned is > that there's a lot of 3rd parties that now rely on it as the source for > RHEL 7, and many of them will have scripts around gitblit's current > setup. Any changes to g.c.o that would impact those scripts would need > to be carefully rolled out with appropriate public notice. One of the key things to chose Gitblit was the api and automation folks can run against it - there are no plans on changing that. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc