[CentOS-devel] The SCL wiki page contents and confusing SCL situation

[Johnny Hughes]

On 05/24/2016 02:20 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
> On 23/05/16 20:28, James Hogarth wrote:
>>
>> On 23 May 2016 17:13, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org
>> <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I take that back .. the file will go away when we move to  6.8 ..
>>
>> Good to know, but I still think it is worthwhile adding the obsoletes so
>> that SCL users who may not realise the repo changed get transparently
>> migrated to the supported solution.
> 
> I agree that this would be a good idea, and probably the original intention.
> 
> If it's OK with the CentOS developers to obsolete their package then you
> can send a PR to
> https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/centos-release-sclo/tree/el6 (the
> 'el6' branch) to add Obsoletes/Provides. The EVR of the package should
> already be higher in preparation.

Yes, obsoleting the package is fine.  I am going to pull both that
package and that original SCL directory/repo when we push the 6.8 tree
in the next couple of days.

<snip>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160524/2971b423/attachment.sig>