[CentOS-devel] The SCL wiki page contents and confusing SCL situation

[James Hogarth]

On 24 May 2016 12:10, "Leon Fauster" <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Am 23.05.2016 um 21:28 schrieb James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > On 23 May 2016 17:13, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I take that back .. the file will go away when we move to  6.8 ..
> >
> > Good to know, but I still think it is worthwhile adding the obsoletes
so that SCL users who may not realise the repo changed get transparently
migrated to the supported solution.
>
>
> this was already discussed here:
>
> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-January/014221.html
>
> and Honza concluded with "it still seems something we should change."

Well good job we're doing it now then!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160524/621b0a6d/attachment.html>