[CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Adding an alternative architecture to your SIG.
François Cami
fcami at fedoraproject.orgMon May 9 14:49:19 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] [CBS] aarch64 & existing builds
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Oulevey <thomas.oulevey at cern.ch> wrote: > > We are able to build packages for new arches we need to propose a > workflow to support a new architecture in a SIG project. > > Two use cases : > > A/ It's an official architecture. > -> Sources *must* build for all enable architecture. SIGs are > responsible to fix issues for all arches. > -> We provide a script that will rebuild existing arch specific packages > (scratch build + merge scratch build) if needed. (Note: In case only > newer version of your project supports this arch, this step may be skipped.) > > => "On Monday SIG board decided to enable aarch64, and then all new > tasks must build for aarch64." +1 from me on behalf of the Ceph Storage SIG. François
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] [CBS] aarch64 & existing builds
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] docker and docker-latest packages on CentOS Virt SIG
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list