On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Sven Kieske <s.kieske at mittwald.de> wrote: > On 11/05/16 08:13, Julien Pivotto wrote: >> We are open to cross sig collaboration. We still have to decide which >> Koji tags we will need for the ansible sig. Once that is done, we will >> work on github where any contribution will be welcome. > > did the config management sig suddenly turn into an ansible only sig? I don't think so. > looking at the suggested tags posted by Francois Cami: As stated at the beginning of the thread, the Storage SIG needs Ansible. My proposal (which is identical to what is in the wiki) was therefore Ansible-centric. > Do you plan to release different tags for each config management tool? See "koji tags": https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/ConfigManagementSIG > afaiu there should be one repository containing all cfgmgmt tools, or is > this not possible due to different dependencies? I don't think this is possible nor reasonable. We are aiming to ship multiple versions of some of these tools and having a single repository simply doesn't scale, but that's just my point of view. Regards, François