On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 20:24 +0200, Julien Pivotto wrote: > On 12 May 11:04, BC wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie at inuit > > s.eu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Please remember that ze do not plan to expose that to users (e.g > > > puppet > > > will be installed in /usr, not in a SCL). However, those SCL will > > > be > > > used for dependencies and/or rebuilds of EPEL packages. > > The big headline on softwarecollections.org is: > > > > All versions of any software on your system. Together. > > > > That is how I have always understood it. So how would installing to > > /usr fit the SCL paradigm? Or has the SCL paradigm changed? > We are not the SCL sig. We do not plan to let you install multiple > versions of Puppet at the same time on your system. > Hi, Why not have multiple versions of puppet, it seems like a good idea. But even with just one I would also put everything in the software collection and just avoid the system, apart from anything else it will clash with the epel pkgs and what not. > Maybe a better way to rephrase it is: > > which prefix will we use for our dependencies that are not packagable > in > the system? > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel