On 05/24/2016 02:20 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: > On 23/05/16 20:28, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> On 23 May 2016 17:13, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org >> <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I take that back .. the file will go away when we move to 6.8 .. >> >> Good to know, but I still think it is worthwhile adding the obsoletes so >> that SCL users who may not realise the repo changed get transparently >> migrated to the supported solution. > > I agree that this would be a good idea, and probably the original intention. > > If it's OK with the CentOS developers to obsolete their package then you > can send a PR to > https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/centos-release-sclo/tree/el6 (the > 'el6' branch) to add Obsoletes/Provides. The EVR of the package should > already be higher in preparation. Yes, obsoleting the package is fine. I am going to pull both that package and that original SCL directory/repo when we push the 6.8 tree in the next couple of days. <snip> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160524/2971b423/attachment-0008.sig>