On 24/05/16 15:20, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 13/05/16 08:12, Matthias Runge wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to re-iterate my interest in having a SIG in CentOS >> to provide all kinds of tools for operators providing >> infrastructure by using CentOS. >> >> The scope should be more than just simply packaging applications. >> Another part should be to provide puppet manifests or ansible playbooks >> to get things quicker up and running. >> >> Ideally, I would start with providing something like >> * elsasticsearch/fluentd/kibana for centralised logging >> * collectd/graphite/grafana for performance monitoring >> * sensu/uchiwa for availability monitoring >> >> We have already seen around 10 persons interested in helping, testing, >> trying out and providing feedback. >> >> For communcations etc. I would propose to start small, and to share >> already existent CentOS channels (email-lists, irc-channel). This >> decision should be revisited, once amount of SIG related communication >> becomes annoying in general channels. >> >> Questions? Thoughts? Additions? >> >> Best, >> Matthias >> > > > how much of this overlaps with the config management SIG ? > I would state, it doesn't overlap, which is not *entirely* true. Opstools SIG could provide scripts/configs to the other SIG. At least both should cooperate on getting things installed. Best, Matthias