On 05/24/2016 07:48 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 24/05/16 15:20, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 13/05/16 08:12, Matthias Runge wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to re-iterate my interest in having a SIG in CentOS >>> to provide all kinds of tools for operators providing >>> infrastructure by using CentOS. >>> >>> The scope should be more than just simply packaging applications. >>> Another part should be to provide puppet manifests or ansible playbooks >>> to get things quicker up and running. >>> >>> Ideally, I would start with providing something like >>> * elsasticsearch/fluentd/kibana for centralised logging >>> * collectd/graphite/grafana for performance monitoring >>> * sensu/uchiwa for availability monitoring >>> >>> We have already seen around 10 persons interested in helping, testing, >>> trying out and providing feedback. >>> >>> For communcations etc. I would propose to start small, and to share >>> already existent CentOS channels (email-lists, irc-channel). This >>> decision should be revisited, once amount of SIG related communication >>> becomes annoying in general channels. >>> >>> Questions? Thoughts? Additions? >>> >>> Best, >>> Matthias >>> >> >> how much of this overlaps with the config management SIG ? >> > I would state, it doesn't overlap, which is not *entirely* true. > Opstools SIG could provide scripts/configs to the other SIG. At least > both should cooperate on getting things installed. Right. I think tools like fluentd, elasticsearch, kibana, etc. don't overlap with config, and we will work with the Config SIG on configuration management best practices for the OpsTools SIG packages. > > Best, > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel