[CentOS-devel] Out of date qemu-kvm-ev packages (bug preventing it from being updated?)

Il 15/Nov/2016 18:23, "Trevor Hemsley" <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com> ha
scritto:
>
> On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote:
> > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>:
> >> On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >>
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm     23-Oct-2015 11:19
 1.9M
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm      08-Aug-2016 17:36
 2.1M
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm     03-Feb-2016 16:51
 2.1M
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm    14-Apr-2016 12:16
 2.1M
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm    09-Aug-2016 12:53
 2.1M
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm    24-Aug-2016 13:40
 2.1M
> >
> >
> > are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)?
> >
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm      08-Aug-2016 17:36
 2.1M
> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm    09-Aug-2016 12:53
 2.1M
>
> That looks to me like the
>
> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm        08-Aug-2016 17:36
 2.1M
>
> was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the
> correct one as
>
> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm      09-Aug-2016 12:53
 2.1M
>

Yes. That's right. And we didn't notice the upgrade issue.

>
> Trevor
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161115/5068a2ac/attachment-0004.html>