[CentOS-devel] When will Centos support SUSE lrbd for high availability iSCSI gateways of Ceph RBD images

Tue Nov 1 08:52:54 UTC 2016
iesool at 126.com <iesool at 126.com>

Thank you for your reply, yes, I also read "their artivle ablout ...."  from  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1636544, sorry.



iesool at 126.com
 
From: Ken Dreyer
Date: 2016-10-31 22:48
To: The CentOS developers mailing list.
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] When will Centos support SUSE lrbd for high availability iSCSI gateways of Ceph RBD images
This question came up in the context of Ubuntu as well @
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1636544 . I'm
curious what article you were reading?
 
Pasting from my response there,
 
To clarify the list of supported OSes for lrbd: I am leaning towards
retiring lrbd from Fedora, and we have no plans to ship that tool on
RHEL 7 within Red Hat.
 
Instead, we're going to use these projects to manage the userland iSCSI bits:
 
https://github.com/pcuzner/ceph-iscsi-ansible
https://github.com/pcuzner/ceph-iscsi-config
https://github.com/pcuzner/ceph-iscsi-tools
 
We have not put ceph-iscsi-ansible into Fedora yet because there is
still some question regarding whether ceph-iscsi-ansible upstream will
eventually merge with ceph-ansible upstream, but it's in progress.
 
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 9:37 PM, iesool at 126.com <iesool at 126.com> wrote:
> Hi all:
>     I read their article about LIO using RBD iSCSI multiple gateway and path
> support for high availability iSCSI targets. SUSE, Fedora24, and RHEL7
> already supports lrbd, but Centos do not.
>     When will Centos support SUSE lrbd for high availability iSCSI gateways
> of Ceph RBD images?
>
> ________________________________
> iesool at 126.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel at centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161101/520ba33c/attachment-0007.html>