On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie at inuits.eu> wrote: > On 12 Nov 12:02, David Moreau Simard wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:37 AM, François Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> > Version-wise, I plan to deliver 1.9/2.0/2.1/2.2 in separate >> > repositories managed by separate centos-release-ansible-{19,20,21,22} >> > RPMs. Any issue during the build and test phases will be reported here >> > or on IRC. Persistent issues will be posted to the wiki. >> >> Does upstream Ansible even support as far back as 1.9.x and 2.0.x ? >> Are you going to be shipping what are basically EOL and >> unsupported/unmaintained versions ? >> >> Looking at releases [1], the last 2.0.x and 1.9.x versions were both >> in April 2016 -- not /that/ old by any stretch but still old enough to >> question upstream about their supportability. >> >> [1]: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/releases >> > > It looks like it would be valuable to have an ansible2 tag -- and repo. > Because that is what most users will want (we can keep 21 and 22 for > power users that want more API compat.). Noted, thanks for the suggestion. François > > -- > (o- Julien Pivotto > //\ Config Management SIG > V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >