On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:58 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com> wrote: > I just learned that Ansible is already packaged in SIGs [1]. Yes indeed! Quoting my original email: "* ansible 1.9, 2.1, 2.2 have all been built in CBS by different SIGs" In fact the goal of the current effort is to make Ansible consumable by other SIGs so that they depend on Config Management repositories if they want to instead of tagging ansible itself into their own repositories. > Can we straigthen that out so that there's not multiple individuals > working towards the same goals ? Agreed :) > [1]: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11347 > > David Moreau Simard > Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO > > dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:12 PM, François Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 6:02 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms at redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:37 AM, François Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>>> Version-wise, I plan to deliver 1.9/2.0/2.1/2.2 in separate >>>> repositories managed by separate centos-release-ansible-{19,20,21,22} >>>> RPMs. Any issue during the build and test phases will be reported here >>>> or on IRC. Persistent issues will be posted to the wiki. >>> >>> Does upstream Ansible even support as far back as 1.9.x and 2.0.x ? >> >> The answer is quite probably "no". >> >>> Are you going to be shipping what are basically EOL and >>> unsupported/unmaintained versions ? >> >> Yes. >> There will be a note in the wiki making that clear. >> Tbh I have no other choice as ceph upstream repeatedly told me the >> ceph-ansible playbook is only validated against ansible-1.9 for now. >> >> One of the goals of the ansible effort is to test that particular >> playbook against different ansible versions and fix the bugs in the >> playbook. >> I'd rather start from a known-working environment than from a broken >> one to do so. >> >> François >> >> >>> Looking at releases [1], the last 2.0.x and 1.9.x versions were both >>> in April 2016 -- not /that/ old by any stretch but still old enough to >>> question upstream about their supportability. >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/releases >>> >>> David Moreau Simard >>> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO >>> >>> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS-devel mailing list >>> CentOS-devel at centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel