On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 11/12/2016 01:27 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >> >> Il 11/Nov/2016 22:03, "Mohammed Naser" <mnaser at vexxhost.com <mailto: >>> mnaser at vexxhost.com>> ha scritto: >>> >>> > >>> > Hi everyone! >>> > >>> > It seems that the latest released version of qemu-kvm-ev is >>> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1 based on the following: >>> > >>> > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=539 >>> > >>> > However, our systems are refusing to update to that package because >>> > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1 is installed. I believe the 16.1 is >>> > making it seem that it is newer than 2.21.1 (16 > 2). >>> >>> Looks like dist tag is not considered in version computation. 21.1 is >>> higher than 16.1 but el7 is considered higher than el7_2. Just to be sure, >>> please try yum clean metadata, and then yum distro-sync. >>> >>> I can confirm this behavior here. In fact, it looks like we've missed > two updates; el7_2.16.1 was released the day after el7.16.1 was, and that > one didn't update my install, either. In checking, it appears that both > have an epoch of 10. > > A yum distro-sync does not offer to reinstall qemu-$subpackage-ev for me, > even after yum clean metadata or yum clean all. > > > karanbir any chance we can get the offending package removed from the repository? So at least rpm -Uvh --force to the newer release will work and yum won't try to downgrade it. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161115/6912cf10/attachment-0008.html>