On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > > > > > Karanbir Singh wrote: > >if we were to try and resolve this without >removing rpms, what would > >that solution look like ? > > Increment epoch. Almost as tasty as removing rpms. > > incrementing epoch will cause a chain of other issues so I don't think it's the good way to go here. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161115/20a57758/attachment-0008.html>