On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, at 06:37 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > It sounds promising to me. I know there's been some pain around repo > mirroring. What do you need from us to advance this? We should start thinking about if this would be a new rpm-md repo or if it would show up in one of the existing ones. And whether that new rpm-md repo would contain the "jigdo set" itself or whether it'd just reference the existing ones. I think my vote is this appears as a new rpm-md repo but for reliability that repo also contains (hopefully hardlinks) to the jigdo set RPMs. There's going to be some period of overlap where we do both, but given the goal I am assuming we cease updates to the ostree repo at some point. That's going to impact anyone who *is* e.g. mirroring it today, but I would be very surprised if anyone doing that isn't already mirroring RPMs too. So just questions like that - we don't have to have it all answered right now.