On 12/18/2017 04:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 12/18/2017 02:23 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: >> On 16/12/17 05:51, Rich Megginson wrote: >> >>>> So a fluentd-ruby24-scl package, a fluent-plugin-add-ruby24-scl >>>> package, etc. etc.? That's going to be a non-starter. >>> It is the only way. You cannot run ruby24 and load packages built for >>> ruby 2.0 - running fluentd on a system which has rh-ruby24 installed: >>> >>> + exec /opt/rh/rh-ruby24/root/usr/bin/ruby /usr/bin/fluentd >>> --no-supervisor -vv >>> /opt/rh/rh-ruby24/root/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in >>> >>> `require': incompatible library version - >>> /usr/share/gems/gems/yajl-ruby-1.3.1/lib/yajl/yajl.so (LoadError) >>> from >>> /opt/rh/rh-ruby24/root/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in >>> >>> `require' >>> from /usr/share/gems/gems/yajl-ruby-1.3.1/lib/yajl.rb:1:in >>> `<top >>> (required)>' >>> >>> The gems in /usr/share/gems are installed via RPM and built with >>> ruby 2.0. >>> >>> It might be possible to perform this conversion at runtime: >>> >>> - install fluentd from regular ruby 2.0 rpms normally >>> - for each gem in /usr/share/gems >>> rebuild using ruby24 into /opt/rh/rh-ruby24/root/usr/share >>> >>> but this is just piling hacks on top of more hacks >>> >>> I think we're going to need ruby24 branches for all of our common, >>> collectd, and fluentd packages, and we're going to need some sort of >>> mass conversion of all of those specs so that we can use them both with >>> and without scl. >>> >> We could also go that route and build ruby 2.4 in opstools (+ rebuilding >> all ruby-packages). >> >> Not sure if we really want to do that. > > I don't really want to do that. > > I think the best course of action is to convert the spec files so that > they can work both with and without SCL (there are instructions on the > SCL package page, and lots of rpm macros to use), then have ruby 2.0 > and ruby24 scl versions of all of our packages. There may even be > scripts which can convert spec files to be SCL-ized. > We will also need a version of gem2rpm that can generate the correct SCL-ized spec file. > I wonder if we can add ruby24 as a "platform" e.g. have a single spec > file, and build e.g. fluentd-1.0.el7.x86_64.rpm and > fluentd-1.0.el7ruby24.x86_64.rpm ? > >> >> Matthias > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel