On 25/01/17 11:18, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:00:47AM -0600, Brian Stinson wrote: >> On Jan 25 10:17, Matthias Runge wrote: >>> what's the process to get the opstools content released for testing >>> purpose on buildlogs.c.o over to a more "official" location on >>> the mirrors? What do we need to do to get rpms signed there? >> >> Make sure you build a release package with the corresponding repo files, >> and open a bug for us, the directory on mirror.c.o corresponds to your >> SIG shortname (e.g.: opstools). Details here: >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/SIGGuide/Content/Release > > Thank you! > > Building a centos-release-* package is something like a > hen-and-egg-problem: You need to know the location where it's going > to be distributed to be able to build a config for it, providing that > exact unknown location. > > What should I put in for opstools in this case? > > There is a centos-release-opstools package currently included in the > testing repo on buildlogs.c.o. Upstream source is here[1]. > > Would > https://mirrors.centos.org/centos/7/opstools/x86_64/ > be an appropriate (and available) location? Yes, and aligned with the other SIGs > > Who would take care of signing those rpms? Who would create the key? > Do we sign content from SIGs at all? Nope, key and signing isn't done by SIGs at all. The process is to create that bug report (assigned to KBsingh), then from his side a key will be created (it it doesn't exist yet) and used to pull/sign/push packages to mirror.centos.org > > Best, > Matthias > > > [1] https://github.com/centos-opstools/centos-release-opstools > -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20170125/5a720dff/attachment-0008.sig>