[CentOS-devel] Adding s390x as an alternative architecture
Brian Stinson
brian at bstinson.comMon Jul 10 14:54:32 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Adding s390x as an alternative architecture
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Adding s390x as an alternative architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jul 10 10:43, Jason DeTiberus wrote: > With the current efforts under way with aarch64 and ppc64le, I would like > to suggest that s390x also be added as an alternative architecture. > Obviously hardware would be the biggest obstacle, but I do not see any > reason why we couldn't get started with just emulated hardware. > > -- > Jason DeTiberus > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel What sort of hardware do we need to support the emulation? I'd imagine this would be painfully slow for the bootstrap, but perhaps that's ok. Is there a group of folks interested enough in s390x to give pointers and/or reviews on the admin side of things? -- Brian Stinson
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Adding s390x as an alternative architecture
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Adding s390x as an alternative architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list