I have built one of the later 3.5 openshift-ansibles, and applied this patch to it. openshift-ansible-3.5.82-1.git.1.f658b01.el7 I've tagged it into testing, that might take up to 2 hours to get there. But when it does, you should be able to do yum --enablerepo=centos-openshift-origin15-testing clean all yum --enablerepo=centos-openshift-origin15-testing update atomic-openshift-utils openshift-ansible\* After that, give it a try and let us know if allowed you to update. Troy On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Scott Dodson <sdodson at redhat.com> wrote: > Can you try this? > > https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/4508 > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Troy Dawson <tdawson at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Jean-Francois Chevrette >> <jchevret at redhat.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > 3 months ago I have used atomic-openshift-utils/installer to setup two >> > OpenShift origin 1.4 clusters. Today I discovered that I am unable to >> > upgrade from 1.4 to 1.5 because atomic-openshift-installer states that >> > "No >> > upgrades available for origin 1.4" >> > >> > atomic-openshift-utils-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > centos-release-openshift-origin15-1-1.el7.centos.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-callback-plugins-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-docs-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-filter-plugins-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-lookup-plugins-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-playbooks-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > openshift-ansible-roles-3.5.71-1.git.1.640cb7d.el7.noarch >> > >> > 1.5 is in the list of supported install variants here: >> > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ooinstall/variants.py >> > >> > However the UPGRADE_MAPPINGS list in >> > /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ooinstall/cli_installer.py only has >> > upgrade >> > paths for 3.4 and 3.5 >> > >> > Is upgrading between origin releases simply not supported/possible? >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jean-Francois C. >> > >> >> Sounds like a bug to me. >> Maybe we need to do a few more tweeks to atomic-openshift than I thought. >> I'm cc'ing Scott Dodson on this to see what the official stance is on >> this. >> >> Troy > >