[CentOS-devel] [OpsTools] fluentd packages tagging

[Sandro Bonazzola]

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Matthias Runge <mrunge at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 07:55:32AM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > On 05/26/2017 02:59 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I just discovered we have an issue with the package tagging about
> fluentd.
> > > fluentd-0.12.26-2.el7
>
> > > $ cbs list-tags |grep opstool|grep release
> > > opstools7-common-release
> > > opstools7-elastic-2-release
> > > opstools7-elastic-common-release
> >
> > We should get rid of these elastic tags, or at least ignore them, and if
> > there are any packages that we need in those tags, we should add them to
> > fluentd-012.
> >
> > > opstools7-fluentd-012-release
> > > opstools7-perfmon-common-release
> > > opstools7-sensu-023-release
> > > opstools7-sensu-027-release
> > > opstools7-sensu-common-release
> > >
> > > can we review the mappings in order to get fluentd packages correctly
> > > published?
> > > Personally I would be happy if fluentd and collectd can be in their own
> > > repo so they won't require openstack as dependency repo.
>
> Packages tagged and not landing somewhere is unfortunate and should be
> sorted out.
> Unfortunately, that is nothing we can do, that is something for
> CentOS infra folks.
>

Well, we need to tell CentOS infra folks which tags should be published and
where :-)
So, I can open a ticket for adding the mappings for fluentd-012 tags, where
the packages should land?

https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/opstools/$basearch/fluentd/ ?
guessed above because on mirrors we have:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/opstools/x86_64/fluentd/



>
> I'm fine with getting rid of opstools7-elastic-* tags, we don't use them
> anymore and afaik, we won't do in the future.
>

Ok, so if nobody objecting, I'll open a ticket tomorrow morning for
removing those tags from cbs.



>
> A while ago, we moved the packages relying on openstack packages to the
> cloud sig, and cremoved the dependency of openstack from opstools.
> Unfortunately, the resulting centos-release-opstools build[1]
> was not tagged and pushed correctly.
>
> [1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=16800


now tagged correctly, not yet in
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/
but should be just a matter of sign and publish which should hopefully
happen soon.



>
> --
> Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
>



-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20170529/f37d1a59/attachment.html>