[CentOS-devel] [OpsTools] fluentd packages tagging
sbonazzo at redhat.com
Mon May 29 10:56:48 UTC 2017
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Matthias Runge <mrunge at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Matthias Runge <mrunge at redhat.com>
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 07:55:32AM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > > > On 05/26/2017 02:59 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I just discovered we have an issue with the package tagging about
> > > fluentd.
> > > > > fluentd-0.12.26-2.el7
> > >
> > > > > $ cbs list-tags |grep opstool|grep release
> > > > > opstools7-common-release
> > > > > opstools7-elastic-2-release
> > > > > opstools7-elastic-common-release
> > > >
> > > > We should get rid of these elastic tags, or at least ignore them,
> and if
> > > > there are any packages that we need in those tags, we should add
> them to
> > > > fluentd-012.
> > > >
> > > > > opstools7-fluentd-012-release
> > > > > opstools7-perfmon-common-release
> > > > > opstools7-sensu-023-release
> > > > > opstools7-sensu-027-release
> > > > > opstools7-sensu-common-release
> > > > >
> > > > > can we review the mappings in order to get fluentd packages
> > > > > published?
> > > > > Personally I would be happy if fluentd and collectd can be in
> their own
> > > > > repo so they won't require openstack as dependency repo.
> > >
> > > Packages tagged and not landing somewhere is unfortunate and should be
> > > sorted out.
> > > Unfortunately, that is nothing we can do, that is something for
> > > CentOS infra folks.
> > >
> > Well, we need to tell CentOS infra folks which tags should be published
> > where :-)
> > So, I can open a ticket for adding the mappings for fluentd-012 tags,
> > the packages should land?
> > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/opstools/$basearch/fluentd/ ?
> > guessed above because on mirrors we have:
> > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/opstools/x86_64/fluentd/
> on buildlogs, the path is https://buildlogs.centos.org/
> There is https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12718
> which also requests to publish packages from
> to https://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/opstools/$basearch/
> Maybe I've missed something?
Brian, can you please look again at https://bugs.centos.org/view.
As Matthias noted, there was already a request for this publishing.
> Matthias Runge <mrunge at redhat.com>
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentOS-devel