[CentOS-devel] where should we build nsible-2.4.1 in CBS?

Ken Dreyer

kdreyer at redhat.com
Thu Nov 30 17:24:55 UTC 2017


Hi Fabian,

Thank you very much for the details here. "cbs remove-pkg" worked
great. We now pull ansible from the Extras external repository.

- Ken





On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote:
> On 21/11/17 00:01, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote:
>>> On 15/11/17 23:42, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No idea how often CBS or the internal mirrors it uses are updated once I
>>>>> push an extras release.
>>>>
>>>> I tried another build today
>>>> (https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=241860) and it failed to
>>>> find ansible-2.4.1.0. I opened
>>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14131 . Is "Extras" set up as an
>>>> external repo in CBS for the ceph build targets?
>>>>
>>>> - Ken
>>>
>>> That happens when CBS/Koji doesn't know (yet) that new package[s] is/are
>>> available in those external repos : don't forget that the builders don't
>>> use the repomd metadata from those os/updates/extras repositories from
>>> source, but rather from what CBS/koji exposes.
>>>
>>> The task to run "koji regen-repo" runs actually on demand and was
>>> triggered in the mean time, so it should be now available for all
>>> buildroots that have Extras enabled.
>>
>> Hi Fabian,
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation!
>>
>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20774 failed on Nov 20th
>> with the same error.
>>
>> I'm looking at our ceph-jewel build tag:
>>
>> $ cbs taginfo storage7-ceph-jewel-el7-build
>> Tag: storage7-ceph-jewel-el7-build [740]
>> Arches: x86_64 aarch64 ppc64le
>> Groups: build, srpm-build
>> Tag options:
>> This tag is a buildroot for one or more targets
>> Current repo: repo#51946: 2017-11-18 08:10:13.074984
>> Targets that build from this tag:
>>   storage7-ceph-jewel-el7
>> External repos:
>>     2 centos7-cr (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cr/$arch/)
>>     3 centos7-extras (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/$arch/)
>>     5 centos7-updates (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/$arch/)
>>    10 centos7-os (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/$arch/)
>> Inheritance:
>>   5    .... buildsys7 [6]
>>   10   .... storage7-ceph-jewel-candidate [737]
>>   15   .... storage7-ceph-common-candidate [653]
>>   20   .... storage7-common-candidate [119]
>>
>>
>> It looks like "extras" is enabled there, right? And it was regenerated
>> Nov 18th, two days after your email.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> - Ken
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> Yes, I saw that failed build, and I even tried to ping you in
> #centos-devel to discuss this with you, but let's do it here
> Centos 7 extras is indeed enabled , *but* you have ansible specifically
> tagged in your repo , something you can see with (and also who added it)  :
>
> cbs list-pkgs --tag=storage7-ceph-jewel-el7-build|grep ansible
>
> So it will pick the one that was "added" for that repo, and not the one
> from the "external" (from Koji PoV) repo, in this case centos 7 extras.
>
> That's also what you can see from mock for that build:
>
> cbs mock-config --task 244229 , that reveals the pkgs list :
> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/repos/storage7-ceph-jewel-el7-build/51946/x86_64/pkglist
>  and so it shows ansible 2.3.1.0
>
> At this point, you should probably sync with other SIG members and
> confirm that you can "remove" ansible from your SIG repo (if nobody else
> has a specific need for older ansible version) and so it will now use
> the one from Extras
>
> See " cbs remove-pkg" to remove ansible from your tag[s] and then it
> should regenerate the internal repo metadata and combine that with the
> ones from external repos, and so start fetching pkgs from extras if same
> pkg (with different NVR) isn't declared in the internal tag/repo anymore
>
> Hope this helps clarifying the situation
>
> PS : if you confirm that it works, we'll also enhance the wiki /
> SIGGuide so that it will be documented for everybody in a central place
>
> --
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list