On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:32:53AM +0200, Thomas Oulevey wrote: >> My proposal would to initiate a rebuild of the new Ansible >> channel[2](within the Config Management SIG) and follow a better release >> cycle. >> >> What do you think ? Would it be a solution from all SIG, or should we >> continue to ship Ansible within each SIG ? > > I would really like to see Ansible built and shipped from a single SIG > instead of each SIG consuming ansible building their own. > It would probably make sense for the Configuration Management SIG to handle it, as it fits neatly within the purview of that SIG. Same goes for Salt, Chef, Puppet, etc. if they're done by anyone in CentOS in another SIG. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!