On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 11:55:41AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: > > You're correct - "vague" was the wrong word here. What's confusing is that > this comment is then followed by HUNDREDS of words of documentation. We've > all spent years with users who, faced by a doc like this, will gloss over > the warning and move right on to the instructions, because the two things > contradict each other, and they're just trying to solve a problem. Yes. Which is why I wanted the crusty and worthless old docs gutted. Because people _still_ were referring to them until a few weeks back. > ok, I'll replace the entire page with "This tool is no longer maintained" > and leave it at that, unless anyone objects. Thank you! > Leaving detailed incorrect instructions "for historical purposes" never ends > well. Indeed. John -- The only time men should be dancing is when other men are shooting at their feet. -- Tim Allen, Last Man Standing -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20180806/71e66494/attachment-0008.sig>