[CentOS-devel] Do we know the reason why this below listed CVEs will not be fixed For elfutils-libelf, elfutils-libs and elfutils pakages ?
John R. Dennison
jrd at gerdesas.comFri Jun 29 06:11:53 UTC 2018
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Do we know the reason why this below listed CVEs will not be fixed For elfutils-libelf, elfutils-libs and elfutils pakages ?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Do we know the reason why this below listed CVEs will not be fixed For elfutils-libelf, elfutils-libs and elfutils pakages ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:43:04AM +0000, Veetil, Vyshnav wrote: > Do we know the reason why this below listed CVEs will not be fixed > For elfutils-libelf,elfutils-libs and elfutils pakages ? > 1.CVE-2017-7607 > 2.CVE-2017-7608 > 3.CVE-2017-7609 > 4.CVE-2017-7610 > 5.CVE-2017-7611 > 6.CVE-2017-7612 > 7.CVE-2017-7613 Probably because they are all marked as Low impact. Past that you will need to ask Redhat as the project only rebuilds upstream sources. John -- The best inheritance a parent can give to his children is a few minutes of their time each day. -- Orlando Aloysius Battista (1917-1995), Canadian-American chemist and author -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20180629/fd10bd22/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Do we know the reason why this below listed CVEs will not be fixed For elfutils-libelf, elfutils-libs and elfutils pakages ?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Do we know the reason why this below listed CVEs will not be fixed For elfutils-libelf, elfutils-libs and elfutils pakages ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list