On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Ken Dreyer <kdreyer at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: >> For anyone not paying close attention: The "latest upstream" from RHEL in >> the "extras" channel is a 2.4 release, the "latest upstream" from EPEL is >> 2.5. This is going to continue to cause update confusion depending on which >> non-default channel is activated. If you want the "latest upstream" from >> ansible source for ovirt, you need the EPEL version, not the RHEL extras >> version. > > The RHEL 7 Extras version of the ansible package is dead and will not > receive updates. > > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/Ansible/SRPMS/ > has the "Ansible Engine" channel's RPMs ( not "RHEL Extras" ). > Compared to what happened with RHEL 7 Extras in the past, I anticipate > that the SRPM versions there will be rev'd more quickly. > > - Ken That channel now has a 2.5.4 release as of 5/4/2018, last Monday. *Good*. Is there a distinct channel now for CentOS, to harvest that package outside of EPEL or extras, distinct as the this channel is distinct? I don't see one in the current CentOS repos. Without that, and without getting out of EPEL, I suspect we're just going to see a recurrence.