Shouldn’t that last tag been an -rc0 instead of v3.9.0? From: users-bounces at lists.openshift.redhat.com [mailto:users-bounces at lists.openshift.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Clayton Coleman Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:44 PM To: Troy Dawson <tdawson at redhat.com> Cc: users <users at redhat.com>; The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org>; dev <dev at lists.openshift.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2018-03-21) Still waiting for a last couple of regressions to be fixed. Sorry everyone, I know you're excited about this. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Troy Dawson <tdawson at redhat.com<mailto:tdawson at redhat.com>> wrote: I didn't see anything saying that 3.9 was released yet. Last I heard they were working on some regressions. If I missed it, can someone point me at it. Maybe I just need a better place to look than the mailling lists. On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com<mailto:zhang.lei.fly at gmail.com>> wrote: > hi, openshift origin 3.9 is released already, > when centos-release-openshift-origin39 repo will be GA? it is still using > alpha tag now. > > https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin39/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuildlogs.centos.org%2Fcentos%2F7%2Fpaas%2Fx86_64%2Fopenshift-origin39%2F&data=01%7C01%7Clarry.brigman%40arris.com%7C44ab399f85214a0db07308d594343d4b%7Cf27929ade5544d55837ac561519c3091%7C1&sdata=Yj4F60B72Jqp51E9Y6R1jD6iTTKfuOGP6uySoqcGuro%3D&reserved=0> > _______________________________________________ users mailing list users at lists.openshift.redhat.com<mailto:users at lists.openshift.redhat.com> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.openshift.redhat.com%2Fopenshiftmm%2Flistinfo%2Fusers&data=01%7C01%7Clarry.brigman%40arris.com%7C44ab399f85214a0db07308d594343d4b%7Cf27929ade5544d55837ac561519c3091%7C1&sdata=dMj9DH7P4e%2Fow7My%2BiZNRZwHVWLM06U%2Bkpt2CDITcbs%3D&reserved=0> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20180327/528cc6ac/attachment-0008.html>