[CentOS-devel] Broken requirements for cockpit

Sat May 12 17:03:40 UTC 2018
James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>

On Fri, 11 May 2018, 21:23 Johnny Hughes, <johnny at centos.org> wrote:

> On 05/10/2018 01:11 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Trying to install cockpit-storaged and getting the following error:
> >
> > --> Processing Dependency: storaged-lvm2 >= 2.1.1 for package:
> > cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > Package storaged-lvm2 is obsoleted by udisks2-lvm2, but obsoleting
> > package does not provide for requirements
> > --> Processing Dependency: storaged-iscsi >= 2.1.1 for package:
> > cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > Package storaged-iscsi is obsoleted by udisks2-iscsi, but obsoleting
> > package does not provide for requirements
> > --> Processing Dependency: storaged >= 2.1.1 for package:
> > cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > Package storaged is obsoleted by udisks2, but obsoleting package does
> > not provide for requirements
> > ---> Package libnetfilter_conntrack.x86_64 0:1.0.6-1.el7_3 will be
> installed
> > ---> Package libnfnetlink.x86_64 0:1.0.1-4.el7 will be installed
> > ---> Package libsemanage.x86_64 0:2.5-8.el7 will be updated
> > ---> Package libsemanage.x86_64 0:2.5-11.el7 will be an update
> > --> Processing Conflict: initscripts-9.49.41-1.el7.x86_64 conflicts
> > redhat-release < 7.5-0.11
> > --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes.
> > --> Running transaction check
> > ---> Package centos-release.x86_64 0:7-4.1708.el7.centos will be updated
> > ---> Package centos-release.x86_64 0:7-5.1804.el7.centos will be an
> update
> > ---> Package cockpit-storaged.noarch 0:160-1.el7.centos will be installed
> > --> Processing Dependency: storaged-lvm2 >= 2.1.1 for package:
> > cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > Package storaged-lvm2 is obsoleted by udisks2-lvm2, but obsoleting
> > package does not provide for requirements
> > --> Processing Dependency: storaged-iscsi >= 2.1.1 for package:
> > cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > Package storaged-iscsi is obsoleted by udisks2-iscsi, but obsoleting
> > package does not provide for requirements
> > --> Processing Dependency: storaged >= 2.1.1 for package:
> > cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > Package storaged is obsoleted by udisks2, but obsoleting package does
> > not provide for requirements
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > Error: Package: cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch (extras)
> >            Requires: storaged-lvm2 >= 2.1.1
> >            Available: storaged-lvm2-2.5.2-4.el7.x86_64 (extras)
> >                storaged-lvm2 = 2.5.2-4.el7
> > Error: Package: cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch (extras)
> >            Requires: storaged >= 2.1.1
> >            Available: storaged-2.5.2-4.el7.x86_64 (extras)
> >                storaged = 2.5.2-4.el7
> > Error: Package: cockpit-storaged-160-1.el7.centos.noarch (extras)
> >            Requires: storaged-iscsi >= 2.1.1
> >            Available: storaged-iscsi-2.5.2-4.el7.x86_64 (extras)
> >                storaged-iscsi = 2.5.2-4.el7
> >  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> >  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> >
> > This is the same with or without CR
> >
> > Did something get a bit broken in rebuilding? On RHEL7 this installs
> fine.
>
> So, extras does not come with CR .. only OS.
>
> There is a cockpit in the Base RHEL and Base CentOS, that version is
> cockpit-154-3.el7.x86_64.rpm (and the other arches).
>
> In extras, for docker and other items, there was also another version.
> In 7.5.1804, that version is    cockpit-160-3.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm and it
> is now released.  It should fix the issue you were having.  If ti does
> not, please let me know.
>
> As to why there is a different version of cockpit in main RHEL and
> another in rhel-7-extras . I have no idea.  But, as we rebuild RHEL
> source code, we have duplicated that setup.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny Hughes
>
>
>
>
I'll verify when I'm back at work on Monday.

Thanks Johnny.

<https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20180512/e9d7f627/attachment-0008.html>