[CentOS-devel] [CentOS-docs] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes

..and yes, I agree it looks better with just the symbol, as that's
what every other logo uses there too.

We could use a vertical version (symbol and the text underneath) but
the space is a bit tight there on that list, so Boxes would need to
redesign that list to allow more space - but essentially it is using
the logos as icons for new virtual machines. The description on the
side will contain the OS name and version number information.

OS type as a default icon for new virtual machines sounds like an useful idea.

Tuomas


On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:27 PM Tuomas Kuosmanen <tigert at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I made a quick test by hacking the boxes XML for Fedora, so it used
> the mentioned logo: https://roboxes.org/res/centos.svg
>
> It looks good to me! Screenshot attached (obviously it reads Fedora
> but ignore that part and see the logo)
>
> Tuomas
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:42 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Adding Tuomas (tigert) to help confirm the SVG is good for submission.
> >
> > On 11/27/2018 11:16 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > > I'll wait till we have the authorization to use
> > > https://roboxes.org/res/centos.svg and then merge it in Boxes
> >
> > What we need is the logo that is missing from the ArtWork page to be
> > contributed to the project so we can host it natively on the wiki.
> >
> > Would the person who made this SVG file (copyright holder) wish to
> > contribute it to the project under the CC BY SA 3.0?
> >
> > I'd intended to ask a designer to make the logo without wordmark file,
> > but if you've got a submission that is accurate -- and especially is
> > derived from the existing logo files so that the colors are 100%
> > accurate -- then whoever made that derivative can submit to the CentOS
> > Project under the same license as the parent file.
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> >
> > It helps by moving us forward on one of the missing bits -- a logo
> > without a wordmark on the Logos page that can be used under the existing
> > trademark guidelines.
> >
> > @tigert -- can you look at the logo file & confirm that it is good?  I
> > don't know or really care if it's derived from a particular source SVG
> > as much as I want to be sure that the uncompressed details (colors,
> > shapes, etc.) are 100% matching to the SVG with logo + wordmark.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > - Karsten
> > --
> > Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid
> > Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen
> > https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io
> > gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig
> >