On 27/11/18 22:49, Brian Stinson wrote: > On Nov 27 21:32, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 27/11/2018 19:24, Brian Stinson wrote: >>> PROPOSAL: Move CentOS CI to it's own "Project" so that it shows up in >>> the dropdown list, and allow us to segment CI requests from SIG requests. >> >> +1 +1 here too >> >>> PROPOSAL: For the Buildsys and CICO projects -only- allow Reporters to >>> Close, Reopen, and Update their own issues. This would leave the Distro >>> and SIG projects unaffected. >> >> are you sure about reporters ( ie almost everyone ) not being able to >> reopen existing cases ? > > Yep, on the buildsys project if a bug gets set to Resolved or higher > the Reporter cannot reopen the bug. There are 2 ways to fix that, allow > reporters to set the bug to any state in the workflow (bad), or use the > explicit "Reporter can reopen" permission (good). > > --Brian wfm -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20181128/c6bec831/attachment-0008.sig>