..and yes, I agree it looks better with just the symbol, as that's what every other logo uses there too. We could use a vertical version (symbol and the text underneath) but the space is a bit tight there on that list, so Boxes would need to redesign that list to allow more space - but essentially it is using the logos as icons for new virtual machines. The description on the side will contain the OS name and version number information. OS type as a default icon for new virtual machines sounds like an useful idea. Tuomas On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:27 PM Tuomas Kuosmanen <tigert at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I made a quick test by hacking the boxes XML for Fedora, so it used > the mentioned logo: https://roboxes.org/res/centos.svg > > It looks good to me! Screenshot attached (obviously it reads Fedora > but ignore that part and see the logo) > > Tuomas > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:42 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Adding Tuomas (tigert) to help confirm the SVG is good for submission. > > > > On 11/27/2018 11:16 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > > I'll wait till we have the authorization to use > > > https://roboxes.org/res/centos.svg and then merge it in Boxes > > > > What we need is the logo that is missing from the ArtWork page to be > > contributed to the project so we can host it natively on the wiki. > > > > Would the person who made this SVG file (copyright holder) wish to > > contribute it to the project under the CC BY SA 3.0? > > > > I'd intended to ask a designer to make the logo without wordmark file, > > but if you've got a submission that is accurate -- and especially is > > derived from the existing logo files so that the colors are 100% > > accurate -- then whoever made that derivative can submit to the CentOS > > Project under the same license as the parent file. > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > It helps by moving us forward on one of the missing bits -- a logo > > without a wordmark on the Logos page that can be used under the existing > > trademark guidelines. > > > > @tigert -- can you look at the logo file & confirm that it is good? I > > don't know or really care if it's derived from a particular source SVG > > as much as I want to be sure that the uncompressed details (colors, > > shapes, etc.) are 100% matching to the SVG with logo + wordmark. > > > > Best, > > > > - Karsten > > -- > > Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid > > Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen > > https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io > > gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig > >
