On 10/25/2018 05:16 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/25/2018 03:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/25/2018 03:11 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 10/25/2018 07:45 AM, Harry Mallon wrote: >>>> Sorry to reply to myself. I have found the bug tracker and lots of related, open, bugs. >>>> >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8659 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14775 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13197 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14774 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14761 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14776 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14777 >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14776 >>>> >>>> >>>> Many of these may be obsolete. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Harry >>>> >>>> On 25/10/2018, 13:33, "Harry Mallon" <Harry.Mallon at codex.online> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I am trying cockpit on CentOS 7. >>>> >>>> 1. Cockpit-system v176 install subscription-manager by default. This is very annoying on CentOS as I do not have a subscription and do not want one. >>>> 2. Cockpit-system v176 has cockpit-sosreport rolled into it. However, the rpm does not have the sos package required as it should do. >>>> >>>> Who makes the packages for the "extras" repo? Is there a better place to report these issues? >>>> >>> >>> The packages in question come from this source code: >>> >>> https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!cockpit >>> >>> The original sources are in rhel-7-extras >>> >>> We have to de-brand / modify the packages, here are the commits for that: >>> >>> https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!cockpit.git/c7-extras >>> >>> If you look at the actual commit for the debranding, I added in the step >>> that normally gets rid of subscriptions .. (line 42 of the commit): >>> >>> https://git.centos.org/commitdiff/rpms!cockpit.git/fc6cf2b2c9befc6fea436bc8c3341d4c46bbec91 >>> >>> Now we need to figure out WHY the require for subscription-manager is >>> still there. >>> >>> Let the troubleshooting begin :) >> >> This link is the actual spec used: >> https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!cockpit.git/c7-extras/SPECS!cockpit.spec >> >> hmm .. looks to me like cockpit-system should NOT require >> subscription-manager .. but it does :( >> > > OK, we figured out that part .. they used %define build_subscriptions 1 > and they used to test the VALUE of that .. but now they just look at %if > %{defined} .. so a 1 or a 0 will both ne true. SO .. I will have to > make a change to test the value or %undefine that variable now. > > WRT sosreport .. are we sure that our modifed sosreport will work with > cockpit (have you used it in the past)? We heavily mod sosreport to not > use subscription pieces and point to bugs.centos.org. Follow up on the cockpit-sosreport package .. it is not in the RHEL version of cockpit, only the Fedora version .. so we will not be adding it in either unless there is a compelling reason. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20181026/1aa6157a/attachment-0008.sig>