[CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
Anthony Alba
ascanio.alba7 at gmail.comSun Aug 25 04:04:59 UTC 2019
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS oVirt Guest Image test report
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
(Of course, we should be asking RH... but nevertheless) EPEL 8 has several issues regarding packages without corresponding -devel. E.g., libXvMC, libbluray. I see that this causes grief for EPEL 8 and collateral damage to RPMFusion. Did RH disclose the reason for this? Was there any discussion on where CentOS will put them, like in Extras perhaps? (I was rolling out some testing VMs in RHEL8 and OL8, and noticed the new but "unsupported" CodeReady repos with -devel packages; yet not all -devels are them.) Cheers Anthony
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS oVirt Guest Image test report
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Reasoning behind RHEL8 packages without corresponding -devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list