On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:15 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 2/18/19 8:07 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > What's the status of this issue? > > Below is my understanding of status. Unfortunately there is no tracker > for this, it's all in this email thread: > > 1. GNOME has permission to use the CentOS logo without the wordmark for > the GNOME Boxes website, as shown in the example provided by GNOME. > - This is already allowed in the trademark guidelines but there was > no corresponding logo with usage guidelines. > - GNOME Boxes can go ahead and use the logo without the wordmark. > > 2. Fabiano needs to track down who made the logo without wordmark and > get that person to give permission to the CentOS Project to use that work. > > 3. Tuomas should have permission to add the stand-alone logo to the wiki > page, AFTER he approves that the submission of work from 2. above is an > accurate logo. > > Frankly, I don't care if we skip steps 2 & 3 and have Tuomas make a new > logo to post. However, Fabiano et al would then need to use that SVG or > binary file for GNOME boxes. I'd prefer if we can make a new logo to post, if someone has the time to do that. I sincerely have no idea how to track down whoever made the logo used in Wikimedia. I will keep waiting ... > > Let me know if any other clarification is needed, > > Best - Karsten > -- > Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid > Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen > https://community.redhat.com | https://next.redhat.com | https://osci.io > gpg: AD0E0C41 | https://red.ht/sig > Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio